It looks like a design patent application can satisfy both enablement and definiteness with a single drawing.
I know, you were on the edge of your seat about this one. Yet, it is a significant case for what is sufficient for a design application. In In Re Maatita, The Federal Circuit found: “[T]he fact that shoe bottoms can have three-dimensional aspects does not change the fact that their ornamental design is capable of being disclosed and judged from a two-dimensional plan- or planar-view perspective – and that Maatita’s two-dimensional drawing clearly demonstrates the perspective from which the shoe bottom should be viewed.”
Some interesting commentary can be found here.
A partner posts a job for a patent paralegal and receives forty applications. Half list a national certification. The other half list five years of
Quick answer: If you are asking what is in a trademark search report, the short answer is this: a list of every identical and similar
A perfectly drafted patent application can still stall over a margin that is a few millimeters too narrow. It happens more often than most applicants
A petition for Inter Partes Review lands on a Friday afternoon, and the clock starts immediately. Exhibits need numbering, a protective order needs tracking, and
A trademark deadline never cares how busy your team is. An Office Action arrives, a Section 8 window opens, and a TTAB schedule shifts, all
A final rejection lands on a Tuesday. The claims are close, but not close enough. Somewhere in your docketing system a three-month clock has already
We’re here to help answer your questions. Trademark and IP matters can be complicated, our experts are on hand to help inform you of every aspect regarding your topic.