An interesting debate to watch is the one surrounding Patent Trolls. Whether a patent assertion is viewed as a “shakedown” or a simple property right enforcement depends on which side of the fence you sit.
Patent trolls have become an ever-increasing problem in recent years. The turning point for the trolls (when it became recognized as a potentially lucrative business model) was when the barcode patent litigation took place.
The barcode patent litigation was an infamous litigation series brought about by Norman Woodland’s estate, a Manhattan Project scientist. Woodland came up with barcodes long before the technology was available to make the idea a reality. With the advent of affordable lasers in the 1970s, barcode technology became economically feasible. Woodland subsequently took out several additional patents related to the idea throughout the 1980s and 1990s. The subsequent court cases generated close to an estimated $1 billion in settlements before the patent was declared invalid in 2005.
In more recent years, the technology sector, in particular, has given rise to all sorts of troll activity, creating a problematic mess to sort out. The sheer volume of patents being filed and granted – many of which are comprehensive – alongside the explosion of apps and software has created a fertile breeding ground for going after anybody and everybody with patents. No matter how tenuous the claim.
According to the Boston Globe, [They] see [themselves] as “doing a service to combat rhetoric by what [they] call the “infringer lobby,” which seeks to conflate all patent assertion work with the more dubious pursuits of unscrupulous trolls. There are bad actors, on all sides.”
Where do you sit? Are “Patent Trolls” or “Patent Assertion Entity” a necessary evil? Or are the trolls simply pulling a “Robin Hood,” helping out the little guy? Tell us in the comments below.
A general counsel opens a spreadsheet on a Monday morning and counts forty-two trademark registrations spread across eighteen countries. Three renewals are due within sixty
A solo practitioner opens her inbox on a Monday morning and finds three Office Actions, a docketing report that has not been updated in two
A client calls with a new brand name they are excited about. Before anyone files an application, someone has to check whether that name is
A missed patent deadline does not arrive with a warning siren. It shows up months later as an abandoned application, a lapsed maintenance fee, or
A client picks a brand name in a conference room, files the application the same week, and receives a cease-and-desist letter four months later. The
A single missed exhibit deadline can unravel months of invalidity strategy before a case ever reaches the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB). That is
We’re here to help answer your questions. Trademark and IP matters can be complicated, our experts are on hand to help inform you of every aspect regarding your topic.