An interesting debate to watch is the one surrounding Patent Trolls. Whether a patent assertion is viewed as a “shakedown” or a simple property right enforcement depends on which side of the fence you sit.
Patent trolls have become an ever-increasing problem in recent years. The turning point for the trolls (when it became recognized as a potentially lucrative business model) was when the barcode patent litigation took place.
The barcode patent litigation was an infamous litigation series brought about by Norman Woodland’s estate, a Manhattan Project scientist. Woodland came up with barcodes long before the technology was available to make the idea a reality. With the advent of affordable lasers in the 1970s, barcode technology became economically feasible. Woodland subsequently took out several additional patents related to the idea throughout the 1980s and 1990s. The subsequent court cases generated close to an estimated $1 billion in settlements before the patent was declared invalid in 2005.
In more recent years, the technology sector, in particular, has given rise to all sorts of troll activity, creating a problematic mess to sort out. The sheer volume of patents being filed and granted – many of which are comprehensive – alongside the explosion of apps and software has created a fertile breeding ground for going after anybody and everybody with patents. No matter how tenuous the claim.
According to the Boston Globe, [They] see [themselves] as “doing a service to combat rhetoric by what [they] call the “infringer lobby,” which seeks to conflate all patent assertion work with the more dubious pursuits of unscrupulous trolls. There are bad actors, on all sides.”
Where do you sit? Are “Patent Trolls” or “Patent Assertion Entity” a necessary evil? Or are the trolls simply pulling a “Robin Hood,” helping out the little guy? Tell us in the comments below.
A petition for Inter Partes Review lands on a Friday afternoon, and the clock starts immediately. Exhibits need numbering, a protective order needs tracking, and
A trademark deadline never cares how busy your team is. An Office Action arrives, a Section 8 window opens, and a TTAB schedule shifts, all
A final rejection lands on a Tuesday. The claims are close, but not close enough. Somewhere in your docketing system a three-month clock has already
A new trademark paralegal sits down with her first Office Action on a Monday morning. The attorney is in depositions until Thursday, and the client
A partner glances at the docketing report on a Thursday afternoon and notices three response deadlines inside the next ten days. Two associates are out
A docketing manager opens her inbox on a Wednesday morning and finds forty new Office Actions, a dozen status changes, and three applications that quietly
We’re here to help answer your questions. Trademark and IP matters can be complicated, our experts are on hand to help inform you of every aspect regarding your topic.