This article will explore the statutory trademarks of the American Red Cross and the U.S. Olympic Rings, examining their legal protections and significance in preventing unauthorized use and protecting their respective brands. There are several ways to establish trademark rights. The most common is through federal or state registration or establishing rights through the common law. Some trademarks, however, are set by statute.
March 6, 2019. Beauregard, Alabama. After an EF4 tornado ripped through Lee County, Alabama, a 24 mile-long and mile-wide stretch was completely demolished. Photo by Ashley Henyan/American Red Cross
The American Red Cross, by statute, has the exclusive rights to use a red Greek cross on a white field. It is codified in 18 U.S.C.§706, which was passed in 1905. Any use before that date is grandfathered in, such as, for example, use by Johnson & Johnson. As a penalty, the statute provides for either fines or prison time, or both. Pretty harsh. The American Red Cross has enforced these rights. Indeed, a quick search of trademark oppositions returns well over 200 oppositions filed by the American Red Cross since 1988. There are likely many more cease-and-desist letters.
The Olympic symbols, emblems, trademarks, and names are also statutorily protected. These include the classic “5 interlocking rings,” the “escutcheon having a blue chief and vertically extending red and white bars” (an escutcheon is a shield-like symbol), and the “words ‘Olympic,’ ‘Olympiad,’ ‘Citius Altius Fortius.’” The United States Olympic Committee has been a party to over 388 trademark oppositions since 1975 and likely many other enforcement actions to protect their marks.
Not that we blame either party for vigorously enforcing these rights. What both parties do is valuable. And keeping the brand strong is critical. Moreover, while registered marks are presumed valid, the validity of registered marks can be challenged. But statutorily created rights like these are rock solid, and enforcement must be quite easy.
Can you imagine having such a trademark in your portfolio? Here you can checkout our Trademark services.
Two Titles, Two Distinct Roles: The difference between an IP paralegal and a trademark paralegal is not just a matter of semantics – it reflects
A Decision That Shapes Your Entire IP Practice: Is it better to hire an in-house or virtual patent paralegal? If you run an IP law
You receive a USPTO office action. The clock is already ticking. Your supervising attorney is stretched thin across a dozen active matters – and the
If you run a small patent law firm, you already know the pressure: tight deadlines, complex multi-jurisdictional filings, and the unforgiving consequences of a single
Missing a single trademark deadline can cost your client their registration, open a brand to infringement, or trigger costly legal disputes. For IP professionals, the
Receiving an office action from the USPTO can feel like a ticking clock suddenly appeared above your patent application. Deadlines tighten. Questions multiply. And sometimes,
We’re here to help answer your questions. Trademark and IP matters can be complicated, our experts are on hand to help inform you of every aspect regarding your topic.